select search filters
briefings
roundups & rapid reactions
before the headlines
Fiona fox's blog
An analysis of a Randomised Clinical Trial, published in JAMA Network Open looks at children and adolescent media use and mental health.
Dr Kristin Hadfield, Assistant Professor, Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, said:
“There is a lot of concern about the impacts of ‘screen time’ on children and adolescents, but most of
the studies are correlational and so can’t tell us whether more screen time causes worse child mental
health. Screen time is a very vague concept, with major differences in effects depending on what
someone is actually doing on their phone, computer, tablet, etc. This paper provides experimental
evidence about the effects of a screen time intervention on children’s mental health, which is a major
advancement. They find that the SCREENS intervention seems to reduce total mental health difficulties,
as well as specifically internalising and externalising problems, while increasing prosocial behaviour. A
few things are worth noting, however: first, they identified 408 families who said they would want to do
the intervention, but only 89 actually did it despite a payment of €70 being oered, which suggests that
many families did not find this intervention workable, and may have resulted in a relatively ‘unusual’
group taking part. Second, parents knew their family was taking part in the intervention and they were the ones who reported on the child’s mental health issues; parents who took part in the intervention, in
keeping with the common understanding that screen time is bad for children, may have responded more
positively on the SDQ because they knew that better mental health would be expected from taking part
in the intervention. Finally, while the intervention was pre-registered, only the SDQ Total Difficulties
score was included as a secondary outcome, yet here they look within that score at internalising and
externalising symptom scores, as well as at the prosocial scale of the SDQ; none of which was preregistered, and so should be considered with caution.
This is a good step in understanding how screen time is related to child and adolescent mental health.
However, we should be careful about over-interpreting a relatively small study as considerably more
experimental research would be needed to understand how, to what extent, and for whom screen time
impacts mental health. People often think of screen time as bad, but it really depends what the child is doing on the screen. Very few people would view it as a negative if a child was video calling their grandparent, watching a documentary, or learning how to code, and we wouldn’t expect any of these things to negatively impact a child’s mental health. A greater focus in research and intervention on what children are doing on computers, phones, and tablets would be more valuable than just counting the time they spend on these.”
Prof Ben Carter, Professor of Medical Statistics at King’s College London said:
“This study was one of the first to show that a screentime reduction strategy evaluated in a randomised
controlled trial found a reduction in some mental health symptoms after just two weeks. One weakness
was the study measurement of screentime included a wide degree of screens (including watching tv), a
further weakness was that some of the analyses may have been underpowered. “Further research is needed to understand the mechanism of what part of the strategy led to the reduction, as well as to understand the proportion of children and adolescents that would like help in cutting down their usage.”
Screen Media Use and Mental Health of Children and Adolescents: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial’ by name of Schmidt-Persson et al. was published in JAMA Network Open at 16:00 Irish time on Friday 12th July.
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19881
Declared interests
Dr Kristin Hadfield: no conflicts
Prof Ben Carter: no conflicts